Why Is Gold Falling During War? The Oil, Inflation and Treasury Yield Connection Most Traders Miss

I’ve spent much of this year explaining why the economic consequences of the war matter as much as the conflict itself. While a lot of traders concentrated on gold’s reputation as a safe haven, I was watching what the war was doing to inflation, the bond market and interest-rate expectations. That relationship is one of the most useful things you can learn as a gold trader, whether you’re looking at XAU/USD today or at another geopolitical crisis five years from now.

Find Ken on X @realkenchigbo · YouTube @Realkenchigbo · KenMacro Discord

What actually happened to gold in September

Start with the evidence before the opinion. The World Gold Council’s September market commentary is one of the clearest pictures of how the market behaved. Gold finished the month at $4,176 an ounce, down 8.5%.

Gold fell 8.5% in a month when gold ETFs were still taking in $10bn. That’s a remarkable split, and it means you can’t simply say everybody sold their gold and moved into government bonds. The evidence doesn’t support anything that sweeping.

Different groups of investors were doing different things. ETF demand stayed strong while positioning in the futures market contracted sharply, and the World Gold Council named higher Treasury yields, dollar strength and reduced futures positioning as contributors to the decline. That’s why I pay attention to flows and positioning rather than relying only on a chart or a headline. I covered how that played out at the $3,900 level in my analysis of gold’s break below $3,900.

The relationship starts with oil, not gold

When I analyse a conflict in an oil-producing region, my first question is what happens to the physical supply of energy. Not whether somebody has threatened an attack, and not whether politicians say talks are progressing. I want to know whether oil can actually reach the people and businesses that need it.

Hormuz is the clearest example. According to the US Energy Information Administration, about 21.6 million barrels a day of crude and petroleum liquids passed through the strait in the fourth quarter of 2025. By the second quarter of 2026 that had fallen to an estimated 4.9 million. Those are quarterly averages, not today’s flows, but they show the scale of the disruption.

The oil hasn’t ceased to exist. The problem is that producing a barrel and delivering it to a customer are two different things, and a refinery in Asia can’t use a barrel that can’t leave the Gulf. Alternative routes, shipping capacity, insurance costs and inventories suddenly matter enormously, and that’s where the inflation problem begins.

How higher oil becomes an inflation problem

Think about an airline. Fuel is one of its biggest operating costs, and when it rises and stays high, the airline has to absorb it, find savings elsewhere or charge customers more. A haulage firm faces the same choice, and so does any manufacturer moving goods around. That’s how a sustained rise in energy prices spreads through an economy, first into fuel and energy bills and then, over time, into other goods and services.

A one-off jump in oil doesn’t guarantee permanently higher inflation. How long the shock lasts, how wages behave, consumer demand and whether firms can pass costs on all matter. In the US this year, though, the official data is clear. September CPI was 3.7% year on year and September PCE inflation was 3.6%, both well above the Fed’s 2% objective.

The energy component of CPI was up 20.4% over the year to September. That’s the size of the energy problem in one number. When inflation is already elevated, another prolonged rise in oil makes life much harder for the people setting interest rates.

Why the Federal Reserve matters so much for gold

The Fed can’t produce oil, and it can’t reopen a shipping lane by changing interest rates. What it can do is influence monetary conditions and demand across the economy. If inflation stays high, the Fed has to ask whether policy is restrictive enough, and markets reprice the path of future rates. Those expectations matter enormously for gold.

On 28 October the Federal Reserve voted 10-2 to hold its policy rate at 3.75-4.00%. The two dissenters, Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack, wanted an immediate quarter-point hike. So the disagreement wasn’t about how fast to cut. Part of the committee thought the inflation problem justified tighter policy.

Look at that from a gold investor’s side. Gold pays no contractual interest, while a US Treasury pays a coupon or an equivalent yield through its price. When inflation-adjusted bond yields become more attractive, investors reassess how much non-yielding gold they want to hold. It doesn’t mean they sell every ounce, but it creates a real competing opportunity.

Bond prices and yields: the relationship every gold trader should know

When the market price of an existing fixed-rate bond rises, its yield falls. When the price falls, its yield rises. Take a government bond with a $1,000 face value and a fixed $40 annual coupon, a 4% coupon on face value.

Now demand picks up and the bond trades at $1,100. The coupon is still $40, but somebody paying $1,100 earns about 3.64% on what they invested. That’s the current yield in this simple example; the yield to maturity also depends on the remaining payments and the redemption value. The coupon didn’t change, the price did.

That’s why falling Treasury yields can mean investors are buying bonds. The better question is why they’re buying. Are they expecting lower rates, worrying about growth, looking for a liquid asset in a difficult market, or is Treasury supply and positioning doing the work? Each answer means something different for gold.

Nominal or real yields: which matters more for gold?

A nominal yield is the return on a bond before inflation. A real yield is the return above inflation, and for Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities it’s the market’s inflation-linked yield. Because gold pays no income, I pay most attention to real yields: if investors can earn an attractive inflation-adjusted return from government debt, the opportunity cost of holding gold goes up.

The breakeven is a rough measure of inflation compensation, not a forecast, and liquidity and risk premia can distort it. It still gives a cleaner way to read gold. If real yields are rising and the dollar is strengthening, gold faces a real headwind. If real yields are falling and gold keeps dropping, you have to look beyond interest rates, and that’s exactly what happened in the recent sell-off. I go deeper on the two measures in real yields versus nominal yields.

Why did gold fall even when Treasury yields declined?

This is one of the most interesting questions in the market right now. On Friday 30 October gold took another sharp fall, yet the official US 10-year yield fell from 4.98% to 4.94% and the 10-year real yield slipped from 2.63% to 2.60%. The textbook real-yield explanation didn’t account for that day, so other forces have to be examined.

1. Futures positioning. September’s data already showed how much a change in COMEX positioning can matter. When traders cut exposure, the selling can temporarily outweigh support elsewhere.
2. Liquidity. Under stress, investors sell what is liquid and easy to sell to raise cash. Gold can become a source of liquidity even though it’s also a defensive asset.
3. Expectations. Markets trade the future, not the last yield print. Gold can react to an expected shift in policy or positioning before it shows up in the closing yield.
4. Market structure. Once important support breaks, systematic strategies, stop orders and discretionary sellers can pile in. The chart can amplify a macro adjustment.

None of those should be presented as the definitive cause of one day’s fall without supporting evidence, and I take that distinction seriously. The price move is a fact. Why investors behaved that way is an interpretation that has to be tested. That’s the difference between analysing a market and inventing a story after it moves.

Does war always make gold go up?

No. War can lift gold demand as investors look for protection against uncertainty, instability and worries about the financial system. But wars also create inflation, raise government borrowing needs, disrupt liquidity and shift the expected path of interest rates, and those effects compete. I wrote about how that premium gets priced in my guide to the geopolitical risk premium.

The mistake is assuming the first column tells you the third. The market has to confirm which regime is actually in charge, and in 2026 it has moved between them more than once.

What does the US election change for gold?

The US midterms are on Tuesday 3 November, with inflation elevated, energy prices high and the conflict with Iran unresolved. On the eve of the vote, the Associated Press reported limited US defensive strikes on Iranian targets in the Strait of Hormuz. They weren’t reported as the start of a new full-scale offensive, diplomacy has continued, and no broader escalation has been confirmed as a final decision.

That distinction matters. A credible agreement that restores energy transport could ease the geopolitical premium in oil and take some inflation pressure out of the market. Renewed disruption to shipping or energy infrastructure would do the opposite. I’ve been concerned about the potential for further escalation after the elections, but that’s my risk assessment, not a confirmed military timetable.

For gold, the question isn’t which party does better on election night. It’s whether the result, the policy that follows and events in the Middle East change expectations for oil, inflation, interest rates and financial conditions. That’s why I’ll keep watching Treasury yields and the dollar alongside gold itself, and I’ll track it through the week in the KenMacro Week Ahead.

What should gold traders watch next?

There are six things I want to understand before I’m confident in a directional gold view.

1. The oil market. Is the price reacting to a verified change in supply, an expected diplomatic breakthrough or a new threat? They aren’t the same thing.
2. The Fed’s expected path. Is the market pricing more tightening, less, or a change in timing? Watch the 2-year yield alongside rate futures.
3. The 10-year real yield. Is the inflation-adjusted return on government debt becoming more or less attractive? Compare it with gold rather than assuming the link always holds.
4. The US dollar. A rising dollar makes gold dearer for buyers in other currencies, but the two can strengthen together under severe stress. Look for confirmation, not a rigid rule, and see how the dollar moves gold.
5. ETF flows and futures positioning. Are long-term flows supportive while futures traders cut leverage, or is everyone moving the same way? Those are very different markets.
6. The technical structure. Has a significant support level genuinely broken? Is price making lower highs and lower lows, is a rebound reclaiming structure or just retesting a broken level, and where is the level that proves the idea wrong?

How I combine the macro with the actual gold chart

This is where a lot of traders struggle. They understand the story, they know inflation is elevated and that yields matter, but when they open TradingView they can’t turn that into a sensible plan. My approach is to start with the economic environment and then use technical analysis to check whether price is behaving consistently with the thesis.

Say my macro view is that gold is vulnerable because real yields are rising and the dollar is firming. That doesn’t mean I sell immediately. On the daily or four-hour chart I want to see lower highs and lower lows, a failed support area, sellers showing up when price rallies back to that broken level, and a genuine change in structure on a lower timeframe.

Most importantly, I want to know where the analysis stops making sense, and that part is non-negotiable. An excellent macro view can still produce a terrible trade if you enter in the wrong place or use the wrong risk, and a beautiful technical setup can fail because the market has just changed its view on rates. The macro tells me the environment, the technicals tell me whether there’s an opportunity inside it, and neither replaces the other.

Three gold scenarios worth understanding

I’m not going to pretend I know where gold trades next month. What I can do is set out what would make its direction easier to read.

Scenario one: the inflation trade returns

Oil supply deteriorates further, inflation expectations strengthen and markets price a more restrictive Fed. Real yields and the dollar rise, and gold faces renewed pressure. For technical confirmation I’d want the chart to stay structurally weak, with failed rallies and acceptance below important resistance.

Scenario two: oil supply improves

Negotiations make real progress, shipping restrictions ease and energy prices fall. Markets take out some of the expected inflation pressure, and real yields and the dollar may soften as rate expectations shift. That would be a more supportive backdrop for gold, but a genuine recovery still has to be proven in price structure.

Scenario three: financial stress takes over

Equities come under real pressure, investors run to liquid government debt and Treasury yields fall. Gold may struggle at first as investors raise cash, then recover as demand for protection builds. Here I’d watch closely for gold showing strength independently of the equity market.

These are conditional scenarios, not predictions and not instructions to buy or sell.

The biggest lesson from gold’s 2026 sell-off

The lesson isn’t that gold is a bad safe haven, and it certainly isn’t that geopolitics no longer matters. Markets respond to several forces at once. The same war can raise the desire for protection and make oil more expensive, and dearer oil makes inflation harder to control, which shifts policy expectations and Treasury yields.

Meanwhile investors can be buying gold through ETFs while futures traders cut positions, and the chart can show sellers still in control. All of those things can be true together. I don’t just want to understand the headline. I want to understand what it changes about the economic environment, and then see whether bonds, currencies and price action agree.

The chart tells you what’s happening. The macro helps you understand what’s driving it. A proper trading process brings the two together.

That framework is worth learning long after this conflict ends. If you want the earlier part of this story, my June research on gold, inflation and rates set out the levels, and my guide to what macro trading is covers the wider method.

Frequently asked questions

Part of the Gold Forecast hub, the desk’s living guide, kept current as markets move.