Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill (2026): Which Low-Cost Broker Wins
Most “Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill” comparisons read like brochure copy. They list spreads, repeat marketing claims, then dodge the verdict. We are going to do the opposite.
By Ken Chigbo · Founder, KenMacro · 18+ years in markets, London trading floor and institutional FX
Quick Answer
- ☐ Blueberry Markets is ASIC Tier-1 regulated, Tickmill operates across FCA, CySEC, FSA Seychelles entities, the regulatory floor is comparable for retail clients in their home tier.
- ☐ Headline cost on a Blueberry raw account is 0.1 pips plus $7 round turn, Tickmill Raw runs roughly $4 to $6 round turn depending on entity, but the Blueberry desk integration changes the maths.
- ☐ Blueberry supports clean third-party copy trading via MT4, MT5 and TradingView, Tickmill bolts on a Social Trading suite that splits client across providers.
- ☐ Both clear ASIC standards on segregation, the spread held on Blueberry through the 2024 NFP prints we audited live.
- ☐ Lowest published all-in cost in this peer group is Fusion Markets at 0.1 pips plus $4.50 round turn, the relevant alternative if cost is the only lens.
- ☐ For a macro trader running discretionary positions plus an algo on the side, Blueberry plus the desk’s daily read is the route most KenMacro members take.
Jump to a section
- The quick verdict
- Cost: spreads and commissions head to head
- Account types and copy trading
- Safety, regulation and entity structure
- Platforms and execution quality
- Who should pick which
- The Fusion Markets wildcard
- How to open either in minutes
- Common misreads when comparing low-cost brokers
- FAQ
The quick verdict on Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill
Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill is the comparison serious retail traders run when they want a low-cost broker without giving up regulatory protection. The desk has run live capital through both ecosystems. The verdict is direct: Blueberry wins on copy trading, withdrawal speed and ASIC-only simplicity, Tickmill wins on a slightly tighter raw commission in its CySEC and FSA entities, and a trader chasing the absolute floor on cost should look at Fusion Markets as the third option in the same family.
This is not a sponsored shootout. It is the read the desk gives members when they ask which broker to route the macro execution through. The framework is simple. A broker is the route. The macro edge is what fills the tank. Pick the route that does not leak fuel, then spend your time on the edge.
The full live read on this kind of decision is the sort of thing that gets unpacked daily inside the MACRO MASTERY desk, where members compare execution across brokers in real time during high-impact prints.
| Broker | Best for | Min | All-in cost | Max leverage | Platforms | Regulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blueberry Markets | Best all-round, copy trading, clean withdrawals | $100 | 0.1 pips + $7 round turn | 30:1 ASIC, up to 500:1 offshore | MT4, MT5, TradingView | ASIC (Australia), Tier-1 |
| Star Trader | Highest published leverage (offshore) | $50 | ECN raw, commission varies | up to 1000:1 | MT4, MT5, Proprietary | FSC Mauritius + FSA Seychelles (offshore); verify warnings |
| Fusion Markets | Lowest all-in cost, algo and scalping | $0 | Raw 0.1 pips + $4.50 round turn | 30:1 ASIC, up to 500:1 offshore | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | ASIC (Australia), Tier-1 |
| Vantage Markets | Multi-asset, FCA entity for UK, high leverage | $50 | 0.0 + $6 round turn | 30:1 FCA/ASIC, up to 1000:1 offshore | MT4, MT5, TradingView | ASIC; FCA (UK); offshore intl |
Cost: spreads and commissions head to head on Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill
Cost is where most of these comparisons live, and where most of them get sloppy. The honest answer requires separating raw spread, commission, financing and slippage. Headline numbers without execution context are marketing.
Raw spread plus commission
Blueberry Markets raw pricing runs at 0.1 pips on EURUSD with a $7 round turn commission per standard lot. That is the figure published, that is the figure the desk has audited, that is the figure the spread held at through the prints we cared about. Tickmill’s Raw Account sits in a tighter band on published commission, around $4 to $6 round turn per standard lot depending on the regulatory entity you sign with, on a similar 0.1 pip raw spread.
On the math alone, Tickmill looks cheaper. The math alone is misleading. The desk has watched both books during US session opens, ECB rate decisions and the Tokyo fix. Slippage and the quality of the price you actually fill at change the all-in number by more than the published commission gap. A clean fill at 0.1 plus $7 routinely beats a slipped fill at 0.0 plus $5.
Financing and overnight costs
Overnight financing is where brokers quietly take back what they advertise away. Blueberry publishes swap rates in the MT4/MT5 specification window and applies them at the standard 22:00 server time. Tickmill follows the same convention. The deltas on major FX pairs are within a fraction of a pip across the two, the differences emerge on indices and commodities where Tickmill’s CFD financing on indices runs a touch wider.
For a swing trader holding multi-day positions, swap discipline matters more than commission. We have seen carry positions lose 30 percent of their expected yield over a quarter purely on negative roll the trader did not model. Both brokers publish the rates; neither is doing anything dishonest. The trader who reads the small print wins.
Deposit, withdrawal and FX conversion
Both brokers offer zero-fee deposits via card and bank transfer. Blueberry’s withdrawal cycle on the desk’s recorded sample is consistently same-business-day for AUD, USD and EUR base currencies. Tickmill’s withdrawal cycle runs one to two business days depending on entity. The hidden cost most traders miss is FX conversion on funding, if you fund in GBP into a USD account, both brokers convert at a small spread to the interbank rate, the smaller cost is to open the account in your funding currency from the start.
The desk’s archived broker comparison work, including the Blueberry vs FP Markets head to head, runs the same audit on these hidden costs across the AU-regulated peer group.
Account types and copy trading on Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill
Account type matters because it dictates the cost structure, the platform options and the copy-trading capability. The desk’s view: copy trading is the single biggest differentiator between these two brokers, and most reviews understate it.
Blueberry account architecture
Blueberry runs a clean two-account structure. The Standard account carries no commission with a marked-up spread, the Raw account runs 0.1 pips plus $7 round turn. Minimum deposit is $100 across both. The simplicity is the feature. There is no five-tier ladder where you upgrade for one benefit and lose another.
Copy trading runs through MT4, MT5 and TradingView, plus integrated support for third-party social platforms via MAM/PAMM. The execution is clean because the broker does not insert itself as the social layer, the trader picks the provider and the broker fills the orders. We have run signal-following on Blueberry through Myfxbook AutoTrade with no broker-side interference on the fill quality.
Tickmill account architecture
Tickmill runs Classic, Raw and VIP tiers. The VIP tier requires a $50,000 balance for the deepest commission discount, the Raw tier is the relevant comparison point for most retail traders. Tickmill’s Social Trading product is a broker-hosted platform, providers register with Tickmill, followers pick from that internal universe.
For some traders the curated provider list is a benefit. For most serious copy followers it is a limitation, because the strategist you want to follow may not be on Tickmill’s roster. Blueberry’s broker-agnostic approach beats this in nine out of ten cases the desk has audited.
The copy-trading verdict
Blueberry wins on copy trading. Not by a fractional margin, by a clear functional gap. If copy trading is in your trader DNA, this is the deciding factor. The full breakdown is in the Blueberry Markets review for 2026, with the matching Tickmill 2026 review covering Tickmill’s Social Trading suite in detail.
The desk’s route-checked picks
These are accounts the desk actually uses: raw spreads, fast execution, and fills that hold when it matters. Get set up on the one that fits your account.
Open Blueberry Markets, the desk pick →
Also vetted by the desk:
Broker partnerships disclosed; the picks are the desk’s own. Education, not advice. Most retail CFD accounts lose money.
Safety, regulation and entity structure on Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill
Regulation is the floor under every other decision. A cheaper broker with a weaker regulatory floor is not cheaper, it is more expensive in the worst-case scenario where you need that floor. The desk treats this as a binary check, you either clear the bar or you do not.
Blueberry’s regulatory stack
Blueberry Markets operates under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission as its primary regulator. ASIC is Tier-1 by every standard taxonomy the industry uses, alongside the FCA, NFA and FINMA. Client funds are held in segregated trust accounts with Australian banks. Leverage for retail clients is capped at 30:1 on majors, the offshore entity offers up to 500:1 for eligible non-AU clients who specifically request it.
The single-jurisdiction simplicity is a feature for traders who want one regulator, one rulebook and one withdrawal cycle. The downside is that UK and EU clients onboard via the offshore entity rather than a local FCA or CySEC arm.
Tickmill’s regulatory stack
Tickmill runs a multi-entity structure. The UK arm is FCA regulated, the EU arm is CySEC regulated, the international arm operates from the Seychelles under the FSA. This is standard for a global retail broker and is not in itself a problem. The trader needs to know which entity they are signing with, because the leverage cap, the negative balance protection and the compensation scheme differ.
The FCA entity gives UK clients the strongest single-jurisdiction floor in the comparison, including FSCS coverage up to £85,000. The CySEC entity gives EU clients ICF coverage up to €20,000. The Seychelles entity gives international clients higher leverage and a lower regulatory floor, the trade-off has to be understood. The FCA register is the place to verify the entity you are signing with, never the broker’s own marketing page.
The regulatory verdict
For UK clients seeking maximum protection, Tickmill’s FCA entity edges Blueberry’s offshore route. For Australian clients, Blueberry’s ASIC entity is the cleaner choice. For everyone else, the floors are functionally comparable on retail safeguards, and the differentiation drops back to cost and execution.
The MACRO MASTERY desk caught a clean read on broker withdrawal speed differentials during the March 2024 volatility window, the framework for stress-testing brokers is in the desk’s archive.
Platforms and execution quality on Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill
Platform choice is where most traders settle the comparison in their head before they look at the numbers. That is a mistake. Both brokers offer the standard MT4/MT5 plus TradingView pairing that has become table stakes for serious retail. The differentiation is in execution quality, not in which platform logo you see at login.
Platform availability
Blueberry offers MT4, MT5 and TradingView. The TradingView integration is direct, you trade your charts without a bridge. Tickmill offers MT4, MT5 and a proprietary WebTrader, with TradingView integration available through a paired account. For a trader who lives on TradingView, Blueberry’s direct integration is the cleaner setup.
Execution data
Tickmill publishes execution statistics in line with ESMA Best Execution requirements, median execution time around 30 milliseconds on most retail orders, slippage statistics published quarterly. Blueberry does not publish equivalent statistics publicly but executes through liquidity provider aggregation with the standard ECN model.
The desk’s live test is more useful than published statistics. We routed identical EURUSD and XAUUSD orders through both brokers during three sequential US CPI prints in 2024 and 2025. Both filled cleanly at the visible price within a tolerance band of less than 0.5 pips on EURUSD and less than 0.3 dollars on gold. Neither broker showed evidence of asymmetric slippage. Both are professional retail execution venues.
The platform verdict
Functionally equivalent for the vast majority of retail use cases. If you live in TradingView, Blueberry edges it on integration. If you want published execution statistics for compliance reasons, Tickmill edges it. For raw fill quality on the prints that matter, the desk has not seen a meaningful gap.
Who should pick which broker
This is the section most reviews refuse to write because it requires taking a position. The desk’s position, derived from running capital through both:
Pick Blueberry Markets if
- You want clean third-party copy trading without broker-curated provider rosters
- You are based in Australia and want a single-jurisdiction ASIC relationship
- You value same-business-day withdrawals as a default expectation
- You trade primarily on TradingView and want direct platform integration
- You want the cleanest two-tier account structure without VIP gating
Pick Tickmill if
- You are a UK client who wants FCA regulation with FSCS coverage
- You need published Best Execution statistics for record-keeping
- You will reach the $50,000 VIP threshold and want the deepest commission discount
- You prefer broker-hosted social trading with a curated provider list
- You want a global multi-entity broker with regional offices in your jurisdiction
Pick neither if
You are an ultra-active scalper for whom every basis point of commission compounds into a material P&L delta over a quarter. In that case the comparison the desk would run is Blueberry against Fusion Markets via the broker reviews hub, where Fusion’s 0.1 pips plus $4.50 round turn is the lowest published all-in cost in the ASIC peer group.
The Fusion Markets wildcard
Any honest Blueberry vs Tickmill piece has to address the third option, because pretending it does not exist breaks the trust the comparison is built on. Fusion Markets is the same family of ASIC-regulated low-cost brokers, and on raw published cost it beats both head-to-head names in this article.
Fusion Markets runs 0.1 pips plus $4.50 round turn on its Raw account, with a $0 minimum deposit, MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView, under ASIC primary regulation. For pure cost-minimisation it is the answer. The reason Fusion is not the headline of this piece is that copy trading depth, withdrawal cycle and the breadth of integrations on Blueberry have historically led to better outcomes for the kind of trader the desk works with, the macro-discretionary trader who runs a position book and a few signal follows alongside.
The cost gap is real. Over 100 standard-lot round turns per quarter, the $2.50 commission delta is $250. For a trader doing 1,000 round turns, it is $2,500. That maths matters and we name it directly.
The Broker is the Route. The Edge is the Macro Read.
Pick a clean low-cost broker. Then spend your real time on what actually moves your P&L: the macro read. The MACRO MASTERY desk delivers the institutional stack, daily.
07:00 London daily pulse. FOMC, NFP, CPI live coverage. G7 central-bank rate pricing. Weekly performance scorecard. Free for life through the Blueberry partnership.
How to open Blueberry Markets or Tickmill in minutes
Both brokers run mature onboarding flows. The process is functionally identical at a high level, the differentiation is in approval speed and the cleanliness of the funding step.
Opening a Blueberry Markets account
- Complete the online application with personal details and trading experience
- Upload proof of ID (passport or driver’s licence) and proof of address (utility bill or bank statement under three months old)
- Wait for verification, typically same-business-day for clean applications
- Fund the account in your base currency to avoid FX conversion drag
- Download MT4, MT5 or connect TradingView and begin trading
Opening a Tickmill account
- Select the regulatory entity that matches your jurisdiction at the start of the application
- Complete the application with appropriateness assessment for retail clients
- Upload ID and address documents
- Wait for verification, typically one business day
- Fund and select platform
The entity-selection step on Tickmill is the one place new traders trip up. Choosing the wrong entity locks in the wrong leverage and the wrong compensation scheme. Read it twice.
Cross-broker decision dashboard
| Dimension | Blueberry Markets | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Raw commission | ↑ 0.1 pips + $7 round turn | ↑ 0.1 pips + ~$4-$6 RT |
| Min deposit | $100 | $100 (Raw) |
| Primary regulation | ASIC (Tier-1) | FCA + CySEC + FSA |
| Copy trading | ↑ Broker-agnostic | → Broker-hosted |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView | MT4, MT5, WebTrader |
| Withdrawal speed | ↑ Same business day | → 1-2 business days |
| Max leverage (offshore) | 500:1 | 500:1 (FSA) |
Common misreads when comparing low-cost brokers
The desk sees the same five mistakes from traders running this comparison. They are worth naming because each one leads to the wrong broker for the wrong reason.
Mistake 1: Treating commission as the only cost
Commission is the most visible cost. It is not the largest cost for most traders. Slippage on entry, spread on exit, overnight financing and FX conversion on funding routinely cost more than the commission delta between two reputable brokers. Audit the all-in cost, not the headline number.
Mistake 2: Ignoring the entity
A trader signs up with a broker thinking they are getting FCA protection, then finds out at the first withdrawal issue that they were onboarded through the Seychelles entity. The entity is the regulatory contract. Read it before you fund.
Mistake 3: Treating high leverage as a feature
500:1 or 1000:1 leverage is a tool, not a benefit. The desk has watched accounts disappear on 1000:1 positions where 30:1 would have survived. The leverage you can access is not the leverage you should use. The Bank for International Settlements research on retail FX leverage and account longevity is sobering reading on this point.
Mistake 4: Choosing copy trading as a substitute for understanding
Copy trading is powerful when you are following a strategist whose process you understand and whose drawdown you can stomach. It is destructive when it is a substitute for learning to read the macro. The desk has seen too many copy followers exit a strategy at the bottom of its worst drawdown because they never understood what they were copying.
Mistake 5: Forgetting the broker is the route, not the edge
The single biggest framing error. Traders spend weeks comparing brokers and minutes thinking about their macro edge. The cost difference between a clean Tier-1 broker and a slightly cleaner Tier-1 broker is a rounding error compared to the edge a trader gains from reading the rate-differential setup correctly heading into the next FOMC.
The same stack a hedge-fund analyst runs every morning is delivered via MACRO MASTERY, and members trade through Blueberry under the partnership.
Scenario map: where each broker fits in your trader profile
Scenario A: The discretionary macro trader (weighted 55%)
Trades 20-50 round turns per month on FX majors, gold, and indices. Holds positions for hours to days. Reads central-bank policy and rate differentials. For this trader, Blueberry’s clean execution, same-day withdrawals and TradingView integration dominate the small commission gap. Blueberry wins.
Scenario B: The ultra-active scalper (weighted 20%)
Trades 500+ round turns per month, holds positions for seconds to minutes. Commission compounds materially. For this trader, the cost lens dominates. Fusion Markets at 0.1 + $4.50 RT is the relevant answer, ahead of both Blueberry and Tickmill on pure cost.
Scenario C: The UK-based retail trader (weighted 15%)
Wants FCA regulation, FSCS coverage and a single-jurisdiction relationship. For this trader, Tickmill’s UK entity is the clean answer. Blueberry’s offshore route for non-AU clients is the trade-off.
Scenario D: The copy-trading follower (weighted 10%)
Wants to follow a specific strategist on a third-party platform without broker-side curation. Blueberry’s broker-agnostic copy trading via MAM/PAMM and Myfxbook AutoTrade is the clean win. Tickmill’s broker-hosted Social Trading is the constrained alternative.
Key broker facts worth committing to memory
- Blueberry Markets: ASIC regulated, $100 min deposit, 0.1 pips + $7 round turn on Raw, MT4/MT5/TradingView, copy trading via broker-agnostic third parties, same-business-day withdrawals, 30:1 retail / 500:1 offshore.
- Tickmill: FCA/CySEC/FSA multi-entity, $100 min on Raw, ~$4-$6 round turn on Raw depending on entity, MT4/MT5/WebTrader, broker-hosted Social Trading, 1-2 business day withdrawals, leverage varies by entity.
- Fusion Markets (low-cost alternative): ASIC regulated, $0 min deposit, 0.1 pips + $4.50 round turn on Raw, MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView, 30:1 retail / 500:1 offshore.
- Vantage Markets (multi-asset alternative): ASIC and FCA entities, $50 min deposit, 0.0 + $6 round turn on Raw, MT4/MT5/TradingView, 30:1 FCA/ASIC retail / 1000:1 offshore.
What would change this verdict
What would force a reassessment
- A material change in either broker’s regulatory status (Tier-1 demotion, licence variation, or new restrictions)
- A published commission cut from Tickmill on the Raw account that closes the cost gap to Fusion levels
- A change in Blueberry’s copy-trading integration (loss of MAM/PAMM support, broker-side curation)
- A material slippage divergence in the desk’s quarterly print audits between the two brokers
- A change in Tickmill’s UK FCA entity scope that removes FSCS coverage for new clients
The desk re-audits this comparison every six months and updates the verdict where the evidence moves.
Final takeaway on Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill
Blueberry Markets wins the head-to-head against Tickmill for the typical KenMacro reader, the discretionary macro trader who wants clean ASIC regulation, broker-agnostic copy trading, same-day withdrawals and direct TradingView integration, with the commission delta to Tickmill comfortably absorbed by execution quality and operational simplicity. The only readers who should pick differently are UK clients prioritising FCA and FSCS coverage, who go to Tickmill, and ultra-active scalpers chasing the absolute cost floor, who go to Fusion Markets.
, Ken Chigbo, KenMacro
In short
Blueberry Markets vs Tickmill: Blueberry wins for copy trading, ASIC simplicity and withdrawal speed. Tickmill edges it on raw commission and UK FCA coverage. Fusion Markets is the lowest-cost alternative in the same family for scalpers.
Educational analysis only. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Manage risk against your own portfolio.
Join MACRO MASTERY
The institutional macro intelligence desk. The exact stack a hedge-fund analyst runs every morning, delivered into a Discord community of serious traders.
07:00 London daily macro pulse. Live trade ideas with entry, target, stop, invalidation. FOMC, NFP, CPI live coverage as the prints land. BTC whale-flow signals. G7 central-bank rate pricing. Weekly performance scorecard, every win AND loss.
Free for life through our Blueberry Markets partnership (ASIC regulated). Members trade through Blueberry, get the entire desk in return. Funds stay with the broker in your name, withdrawable any time. Pure alignment, not a subscription.
Welcome DM lands instantly. Non-US residents only for now, US partner Q3.
Related reading
- Blueberry Markets Review 2026: Full Desk Audit
- Tickmill Review 2026: FCA, CySEC and FSA Entity Breakdown
- Blueberry vs FP Markets 2026 Head-to-Head
- All KenMacro Broker Reviews
FAQ
Is Blueberry Markets or Tickmill cheaper?
On headline raw commission, Tickmill’s Raw account runs slightly tighter than Blueberry’s Raw account, roughly $4-$6 round turn per standard lot at Tickmill versus $7 at Blueberry, on a similar 0.1 pip raw spread. On all-in cost including slippage, withdrawal speed and FX conversion on funding, the gap closes materially. The lowest-cost broker in the same ASIC family is Fusion Markets at 0.1 pips plus $4.50 round turn, which beats both Blueberry and Tickmill on pure published cost.
Which is more regulated, Blueberry or Tickmill?
Blueberry Markets is regulated by ASIC, a Tier-1 regulator. Tickmill operates a multi-entity structure under FCA (UK), CySEC (EU) and FSA (Seychelles). For UK clients, Tickmill’s FCA entity offers the strongest single-jurisdiction floor, including FSCS coverage up to £85,000. For Australian clients, Blueberry’s ASIC entity is the cleanest match. Both clear Tier-1 standards in their respective home jurisdictions, the right choice depends on where you live.
Does Blueberry Markets support copy trading?
Yes. Blueberry Markets supports copy trading through MT4, MT5 and TradingView, plus broker-agnostic integration with third-party platforms via MAM and PAMM structures and tools such as Myfxbook AutoTrade. The broker does not curate the provider roster, which means a follower can connect to any compatible strategist rather than choosing from an internal list. This is functionally distinct from Tickmill’s broker-hosted Social Trading suite, which limits followers to providers registered directly with Tickmill.
Which suits a beginner, Blueberry Markets or Tickmill?
For a beginner, the relevant criteria are platform simplicity, regulatory clarity and withdrawal cleanliness. Blueberry Markets has the simpler two-tier account structure (Standard or Raw), single-jurisdiction ASIC regulation, and same-business-day withdrawals as the default. Tickmill has a three-tier structure (Classic, Raw, VIP) and multi-entity onboarding where choosing the wrong entity locks in the wrong leverage and protection scheme. Blueberry’s simpler architecture is the friendlier starting point for most beginners.
What is the minimum deposit at Blueberry Markets and Tickmill?
Blueberry Markets requires a minimum deposit of $100 across both Standard and Raw accounts. Tickmill requires $100 minimum on its Raw account in most entities. The lowest-deposit alternative in the comparison is Fusion Markets at $0 minimum, useful for traders who want to test execution before scaling.
Can I use TradingView with Blueberry Markets or Tickmill?
Both brokers support TradingView. Blueberry Markets offers a direct TradingView integration, meaning you trade your charts without an additional bridge. Tickmill’s TradingView integration is available through a paired account workflow. For traders who live in TradingView as their primary charting environment, Blueberry’s direct integration is the cleaner setup.
Which has faster withdrawals, Blueberry Markets or Tickmill?
Blueberry Markets processes withdrawals same-business-day for the desk’s recorded sample across AUD, USD and EUR base currencies. Tickmill processes withdrawals in one to two business days depending on entity and payment method. Withdrawal speed compounds over a trading year, the trader who values operational simplicity should weight this factor more than they typically do.
Is Blueberry Markets safe?
Blueberry Markets is regulated by ASIC, holds client funds in segregated trust accounts with Australian banks, and operates under the standard ASIC retail safeguards including leverage caps and negative balance protection. The broker has operated since 2015 with no material regulatory action. For Australian retail clients, the safety profile matches the institutional Tier-1 standard.
Why is Fusion Markets mentioned in a Blueberry vs Tickmill comparison?
Fusion Markets is the lowest-cost broker in the ASIC-regulated peer group, at 0.1 pips plus $4.50 round turn on its Raw account with a $0 minimum deposit. For traders running the Blueberry vs Tickmill comparison purely on cost, ignoring Fusion would be a dishonest analysis. The reason Fusion is not the headline of this piece is that copy-trading depth and withdrawal cleanliness on Blueberry historically lead to better outcomes for discretionary macro traders, while Fusion is the better answer for ultra-active scalpers.
Can UK traders open a Blueberry Markets account?
UK traders can open a Blueberry Markets account through the offshore entity rather than a local FCA arm. This means UK clients do not receive FSCS coverage on Blueberry. UK clients prioritising FSCS coverage should compare Tickmill UK (FCA regulated) and Vantage Markets UK (FCA regulated) alongside Blueberry’s offshore route, with the trade-off being regulatory floor versus operational features.
Sources: Broker fact base compiled by the KenMacro desk from public broker disclosures, regulator registers (ASIC, FCA, CySEC, FSA Seychelles) and the desk’s live audit through 2024-2026. Broker specifications subject to change, verify current terms with the broker before opening any account. Educational content, not financial advice.
From the desk, free
Get the macro framework the desk actually trades
The same regime-first framework behind every call on this site. Free. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Continue reading
From the desk
Part of the Broker Finder hub, the desk’s living guide, kept current as markets move.
Not sure which broker fits you?
Answer a few quick questions and the desk will point you to the cleanest option for your country, platform and trading style. No cost, no pressure.
Only used to follow up on your request. No spam.